8(d)2

8(d)2 FCE loss of occupation

Exaggeration and Misrepresentations by Petitioner Result in Reduction of Award by Commission

In a victory for Respondents at large, the Commission reduced an Arbitrator’s award from 30% loss of use to the man as a whole to 22.5% “Exaggeration and Misrepresentations by Petitioner Result in Reduction of Award by Commission”

8(d)1 8(d)2 wage differential

Commission Finds Wage Differential Award Speculative, Awards § 8(d)2 MAW Instead

In Nebelsick v. Smith Specialized Heavy Hauling, 10 IL.W.C. 17711 (Ill. Indus. Com’n Oct. 24, 2013), the Commission found that the Arbitrator’s wage differential award “Commission Finds Wage Differential Award Speculative, Awards § 8(d)2 MAW Instead”