Skip to content

A Midwest Regional Law Firm Representing Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa, Michigan, and Minnesota Employers in the areas of Workers' Compensation, Subrogation, Employment and General Liability Defense
  • About the Firm
    • The Inman & Fitzgibbons Team
    • Client References
    • Client Service Plan
    • Firm Overview
    • Practice Areas
      • Workers’ Compensation Defense
      • General Liability Defense
      • Employment Law
    • Disclaimer + Copyright Notices
  • News & Events
  • Contact Our Firm
    • Office Locations
    • Subscriptions
  • Attorneys
    • Partners
      • Thomas J. Fitzgibbons
      • G. Steven Murdock
      • Jack Shanahan
      • Kevin Deuschle
      • Terry Donohue
      • Colin Mills
      • Mark Carter
      • Scott McCain
      • Jynnifer E. Cotharn
      • Jill Baker
      • Kristin Thomas
      • Allison Schaeffer
    • Associate Attorneys
      • Paul Tsukuno
      • Sonia Das Sturm
      • Michael Bantz
      • Frank Johnston
      • Tony Ulm
      • Jason Stetz
    • Of Counsel
      • Micheal Inman
      • Julie Bruch

Tag: MMI

maximum medical improvementMMIvocational rehabilitationwage differential

Benefits Denied after I&F Establishes Petitioner is at MMI

January 27, 2014

Inman & Fitzgibbons recently prevailed at arbitration and on review in a recent case handled by Jynnifer Bates on the petitioner’s 19b / 8(a) Motion “Benefits Denied after I&F Establishes Petitioner is at MMI”

ChiropracticIllinois Worker's CompensationIMEInman & FitzgibbonsIWCCLumbarMMIPPDSection 12

I&F Case Study: The IME and Issues of Necessary Medical Treatment

December 21, 2011

Although reasonable people might disagree as to the benefits of chiropractic care in the WC arena, there is no arguing the fact that a long “I&F Case Study: The IME and Issues of Necessary Medical Treatment”

carpal tunnelIllinois Worker's CompensationInman & FitzgibbonsIWCCMMIPPDrepetitive traumaTTD

I&F wins where petitioner fails to carry burden of proof

December 13, 2011

The Commission recently reversed an unfavorable decision by the Arbitrator as to our client’s liability for renewed treatment and lost time five months after the “I&F wins where petitioner fails to carry burden of proof”

SEARCH

RECENT POSTS

  • Inman and Fitzgibbons merges with OKGC to launch IFMK Law, Ltd. May 29, 2023
  • I&F to Present at Annual Workers’ Compensation and Safety Conference in Lisle, IL on Nov. 2  October 14, 2022
  • I&F to Host Seminar in Lisle, IL on Oct. 26 October 10, 2022
  • I&F to Host November Seminar in Springfield, IL September 20, 2022

CATAGORIES

  • Cases & Legal Developments (131)
  • Cases & Legal Developments (28)
  • Commission News (80)
  • Company News (22)
  • Featured (9)
  • For Employers (140)
  • home (130)
  • I&F Videos (3)
  • Illinois News (158)
  • Indiana News (13)
  • Inman & Fitzgibbons Updates (128)
  • Insurance Industry (126)
  • Iowa News (11)
  • Michigan News (9)
  • Missouri News (12)
  • Ohio News (6)
  • Uncategorized (19)
  • Wisconsin News (16)
| Designed by: Theme Freesia | WordPress | © Copyright All right reserved